Native Son: Narrated
One of the most striking and
distinctive features about Native Son is the uncensored, unflinching narration.
Bigger's life is described in immense detail, from the moment he wakes up, to
killing Mary, to his time in trial and his jail cell. This type of incredibly
thorough narration is used throughout the novel, except when it comes to
moments with dialogue. In those cases, the narration starts to vary. I noticed
that there are roughly three categories of dialogue narration, I’ll call them “heavy”,
“medium”, and “light” narration.
I’ll start with heavy narration.
This is the most striking, and the one that we spent the most time in class
discussing. This “heavy” narration is separate from the flow of the plot, a step
back from what is going on, where we see Bigger's conscious (and subconscious)
fully at work. Heavy narration is primarily used in situations where Bigger is
uncomfortable. A good example is Bigger in the Dalton’s home for the first time
on page 46. There, he is confused, and feels out-of-place. His confusion
requires him to think through every action, hyper-analyze every movement, and
be incredibly self-aware about what he’s doing and what it could mean. In general,
he acts this was around unfamiliar white people in situations he can’t control
(namely the Dalton home, the car with Jan and Mary, and the court).
Medium narration
is where there is narration between the lines, but it is not very far removed
from the dialogue, just a layer of Bigger’s thoughts about the conversation. It’s
used where Bigger feels semi-comfortable: either places where he is surrounded
by black people but the situation is tense and unfamiliar, or with white people
but he has some amount of control. The first fight with Gus (on page 27) is
tense and unfamiliar, but he doesn’t actively fear for his life, just maybe his
pride. He doesn’t have to so carefully think through every move. With Britten’s
interrogation, although he is surrounded by white people, he has a plan and a
cover story, so he feels at least somewhat in control of the situation.
Finally, light
narration is places where there is zero to no narration during a conversation. It’s
used where Bigger feels completely comfortable or in control of the situation. With
Gus on page 19, as he “plays white”, he is filling a fun and familiar role,
with little stress about judgement or fear for his life. On 144, when he tells
Bessie about the ransom plan, although the mood isn’t as lighthearted, he is in
total control of Bessie and the situation. Limited narration feels immediate,
present-tense, and easy. Bigger doesn’t struggle with his role in his setting,
and he doesn’t have to think through his actions, he just does them.
With the differing narration, Wright
chooses what distance to puts us from the events. The less narration, the
clearer and more immediate the events, while more narration makes scenes
slower, and the readers more removed from the action. Wright does this in a
very subtle way, and once I noticed the pattern, it was interesting how often
he used this technique. It is incredibly effective at conveying Bigger’s
anxiety in different situation, especially around white people.
Cool post! Interesting the way the narration follows that pattern so religiously. As you said, level of narration depends on how much control Bigger has in the scene - the more narration, the less control. It almost feels like the narrator is stepping in for Bigger, maybe even taking extra control away from Bigger in those scenes, to make a point. The narration not only correlates with how much control Bigger has, but also influences how much control Bigger has.
ReplyDeleteI feel that by the narrator constantly stepping in for bigger in these intense situations, we miss an important connection to bigger. By being unable to view these events exactly from Bigger's perspective we get more of the analytical view of the narrator making the events less personal, and framing the novel in more of that "observational experiment" view that Wright talks about.
ReplyDelete